Wristshot Contest sponsored by WackoBirdKeeper - Page 2

acharria · 07-28-2010, 05:25 PM

any handicap for some members!!!

I will be in for the fun...
TKS WBK...

WackoBirdKeeper · 07-30-2010, 08:52 PM

Good luck to all the entrants! This should be fun! lets get some nice shots going!

I'm looking forward to some great pictures!

Pix · 08-01-2010, 11:15 AM

Thx WBK and thx RWI, indeed this only happens here

gapple · 08-01-2010, 04:34 PM

Don't bother you guys. The watch is mine. It has my initials on it. My name is India Whiskey Charlie.

Anopsis · 08-01-2010, 06:08 PM

How much will post-production editing affect this? There are some people here that are just downright wicked with Photoshop.

Maybe all the pics should be submitted in RAW format.

watchbuff · 08-02-2010, 06:54 AM

I agree, pics in the raw is fair.

gumption rusty · 08-02-2010, 08:54 AM

pics in RAW isn't fair - that's just the potential for what a photo can become.

perhaps radically changing the photo shouldn't be allowed - but RAW simply provides a basis for giving a photo the color, shading, etc that you want. nothing wrong with that.

Pix · 08-02-2010, 09:06 AM

I'm using PS, always... At my humble level, as my skills are far from the PS geeks. And I know that this topic always pops up when contests are launched.
I believe that PS does not make a good pic, it enables to improve or change its atmosphere. But if the pic is bad, it is bad.

If it's not original, it has few chances to become so.

What is a picture in the end ? The photographer's mind : no software will replace this. Besides, we all know that all pics are photoshopped nowadays : some in an outrageous way, some in a discrete one. The most important IMO is to see the result, not how it was reached.

If you want a raw pic, you also should forbid light tents, filters, long exposures for lumeshots etc...

BTW, my best pics (to my eyes) were realized without PS (see my avatar).

However many artifices were used to build it : kind of PS "live". So where's the limit between a raw picture and a picture that is modified ..?

And who want babes without make-up ?

JellyJoe · 08-02-2010, 10:06 AM

Great event as always on the best forum in the Milky Way (cant guarantee beyond the 14th sector of the galaxy tho), thx Guru and WBK for organizing and offering an awesome looking watch.
This should be fun

gumption rusty · 08-02-2010, 10:10 AM

I thought this contest would start this week - any idea on when we'll get the official rules?

07-28-2010, 05:25 PM	#11
acharria Amazed by R2D4 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: cali, Colombia. S.A. Posts: 1,213	any handicap for some members!!! I will be in for the fun... TKS WBK... __________________ The PICS HUNTER.....Beware of my Fury!!!!! I´m looking and looking around.....and i got it. PAM 196. PAM 196 REVIEW

07-30-2010, 08:52 PM	#12
WackoBirdKeeper Trusted Watch Dealer Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: East Coast - USA Posts: 1,506	Good luck to all the entrants! This should be fun! lets get some nice shots going! I'm looking forward to some great pictures! __________________ He was the fastest gun in the west. No one could deliver a watch faster!!!

08-01-2010, 11:15 AM	#13
Pix RWI Photographer Award'08 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: E.U. Posts: 3,683	Thx WBK and thx RWI, indeed this only happens here __________________ > Latest Pictorial : My HBB project < > My current collection and watch reviews < > Le French Corner on RWI < Please do not PM questions which you can post on the boards, I won't answer them : besides a question that is asked on the boards and finds an answer will be profitable for all the members. Thank you.

08-01-2010, 04:34 PM	#14
gapple VIP MEMBER / SUPPORTER! Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: SoCal Posts: 184	Don't bother you guys. The watch is mine. It has my initials on it. My name is India Whiskey Charlie. __________________ - "There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) ------------------------------

08-02-2010, 06:54 AM	#16
watchbuff Chief Pilot of the Darkside Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In Repgeeks Matrix. Posts: 2,778	I agree, pics in the raw is fair. __________________ The best revenge is living well. By watchbuff Gen: Bell and Ross 03-88 Aviation Type Breitling B-2 Lum Tec Combat B-1 Lum Tec M-15 Lum Tec Lumzilla Movado Stainless Tissot T- Touch titanium Stowa Pro Diver Luminox 3053 custom by Flav Casio ProTrek titanium Casio G-Shock - Hydro Conversion Seiko Orange Monster Seiko Black Monster (Custom Lume Bezel) Hamilton Khaki Aviation 7750 Classic Swatch GK104 Rep: DSN PAM 111H Ultimate Jimmy Fu case Palp crown Had/Sold/Traded Gen Bell and Ross 01-92 (For a Breitling Emergency) Gen Breitling Emergency (Sold outright) Too many rep Submariners, and Noobmariners to count (Sold, destroyed, modded and parted) MBW GMT II with Coke bezel, gen box tags and gen Pepsi bezel spare. (sold) Rep Pam 005 (Sold) Rep Omega Seamaster Professional ala Fakey (Sold) Rep Omega Broad Arrow White (sold- and missing it)

08-02-2010, 08:54 AM	#17
gumption rusty I'm Here A Lot! Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Bratislava, Slovakia Posts: 103	pics in RAW isn't fair - that's just the potential for what a photo can become. perhaps radically changing the photo shouldn't be allowed - but RAW simply provides a basis for giving a photo the color, shading, etc that you want. nothing wrong with that. __________________ Owned:............................Waiting on:................................Want to buy: IWC Big Pilot 5004.............Rolex DSSD...............................Breitling Super Ocean Panerai 1950.....................Hublot Big Bang Rose Gold..........Zenith El Primero Last edited by gumption rusty; 08-02-2010 at 08:58 AM.

08-02-2010, 09:06 AM	#18
Pix RWI Photographer Award'08 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: E.U. Posts: 3,683	I'm using PS, always... At my humble level, as my skills are far from the PS geeks. And I know that this topic always pops up when contests are launched. I believe that PS does not make a good pic, it enables to improve or change its atmosphere. But if the pic is bad, it is bad. If it's not original, it has few chances to become so. What is a picture in the end ? The photographer's mind : no software will replace this. Besides, we all know that all pics are photoshopped nowadays : some in an outrageous way, some in a discrete one. The most important IMO is to see the result, not how it was reached. If you want a raw pic, you also should forbid light tents, filters, long exposures for lumeshots etc... BTW, my best pics (to my eyes) were realized without PS (see my avatar). However many artifices were used to build it : kind of PS "live". So where's the limit between a raw picture and a picture that is modified ..? And who want babes without make-up ? __________________ > Latest Pictorial : My HBB project < > My current collection and watch reviews < > Le French Corner on RWI < Please do not PM questions which you can post on the boards, I won't answer them : besides a question that is asked on the boards and finds an answer will be profitable for all the members. Thank you.

08-02-2010, 10:06 AM	#19
JellyJoe YE OL' CAP'N Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: EU, sleeping in a drawer Posts: 1,723	Great event as always on the best forum in the Milky Way (cant guarantee beyond the 14th sector of the galaxy tho), thx Guru and WBK for organizing and offering an awesome looking watch. This should be fun __________________ The fugitive chicken still struts on...

08-02-2010, 10:10 AM	#20
gumption rusty I'm Here A Lot! Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Bratislava, Slovakia Posts: 103	I thought this contest would start this week - any idea on when we'll get the official rules? __________________ Owned:............................Waiting on:................................Want to buy: IWC Big Pilot 5004.............Rolex DSSD...............................Breitling Super Ocean Panerai 1950.....................Hublot Big Bang Rose Gold..........Zenith El Primero

Page generated in 0.91191 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 20 queries
	Contact Us - Replica Watch - Archive - Top